Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tertius's commentslogin

Level of annoyance = level of complaint. It's not weird, it's to be expected.


Can you name one example where the context was not someone who was handling/processing/had the data as a part of their platform (i.e. FB) but rather a hosting provider where you've been burned assuming?


We have similar plans.


That was quite a game. No breaks, all action.



> Died: 7 September 1990 (aged 50–51)

Odd how this part often gets ignored when his example is cited.


Well, he lived for a long time at >200kg (>450lbs), and lost over 120kg (270lbs).

It's not a surprise that his lifespan was shorter than average.

Given his death was a quarter of a century after he finished his fast, I'm not sure it makes the causal implication you are suggesting.


https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21673486

Allegedly health problems from obesity and stomach bleeding killed him. Questionably related to the fast,probably related to the health problems that got him to do the fast in the forst place.


> It's not a surprise that his lifespan was shorter than average.

Given all of the purported health benefits of fasting I see touted on HN, and given how long he fasted, if anything I'd expect him to have lived to 100.


Well he would have if he didn't start eating again.


That was 25 years after his fast, but there have been other cases with complications

E.g. one lady (1st case in the lnk below) who fasted for 4 months ended up in the hospital for 3 weeks with cardiac arrhythmias and they also found her heart tissue muscles were scared and filled with holes (I believe thats what vacuolated means)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1238550/pdf/wes...

I'm a fan of a 7 day prolonged fast, but not for anything longer


Without any cause listed dying at 50-51 is not rare at all and should not be assumed to be related to a particular cause. In fact, life expectancy of those born on 1940 was 60.8 years, making it within 10 year of the average, something totally normal IMHO (it's like today, with a 78-year life expectancy, someone dying at 68 years old, totally not surprising).


Life expectancy is a tricky stat. One of those cases where mean vs median vs mode is really important. Especially when talking about a period anchored in a global conflict with vast civilian casualties.


25 years after the fast. Are you implying fasting reduces lifespan? Because that would be an hilariously first world concept.

"Remember, to be healthy you need to have 5 small meals during the day. Don't let yourself get hungry," cry the Western dieticians.


This isn't an MBS problem. It's just a poorly performing asset problem.


You're telling me there are just as many windows as there are wind turbines? Or are you lying with statistics?


If you signed a contract for a year with a clause that you could cancel before then if you move to an area without one of their gyms then this seems reasonable.

I've had my own experiences with gyms being hard to cancel. But in principle if I want an easy cancellation then I'll go month to month. If I have a 12 month contract I'm not going to cry if they resist when I want to cancel early...


I drive car wagon with a large spacious rear area. I limit my shopping trips, I buy in bulk.

You have to be very disciplined to get as efficient with Amazon. It's probably not really possible.


I have 6 neighbors in my cul-de-sac. The Amazon truck probably visits 5 out of 7 days a week. I never worried about whether my Amazon purchases were wasteful based on trucks and fuel. They were quite wasteful in the sense that I bought a lot of cheap crap I didn't actually need.


This is the worst thing about it. Holding something and deciding if it's worth your money is a much longer process than clicking "buy now", and you've probably don't even remember doing it when the goods show up in front of your door.


Just shop with a list and don't break the rule of not buying anything not on the list.


Amazon day is probably similar. There's a designated day of the week where they deliver everything I've ordered that week. I don't have hard data, but it makes sense that if more than one person in my building/block/etc does the same (thus sharing the same delivery vehicle), it's probably less driving/gas overall.


What's the best argument against your straw man here?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: