> I learned that One Does Not Simply put glass in front of a TFT display. It will look like a first-generation, low-budget Android phone if you do.
Do you happen to have any before-and-after photos of what this looked like, and more details on how your tortilla press DIY method works? I recently received a little hackable music player device with a TFT display that looks kind of bad and I wonder if this is something I can do to make the display look good.
The process was applying steady pressure to the TFT display -> OCA film -> glass, sandwiched between soft rubber, for about a minute. However you need to do a decent job applying the OCA film in the first place - there are youtube videos that show how to do it.
I probably wouldn't recommend what I did in your case - it's easy to go too far and break the glass, and I'm not sure if what's wrong in your case is due to the OCA film in between the display and the glass.
FWIW, there is an alternative to OCA film that's slightly easier to apply in small quantities without specialized hardware - it's called LOCA glue (i.e. Liquid OCA).
I'd definitely recommend that if you're just assembling less than, say, 10 screens.
Exactly! There probably is a disconnect in perception driven by political agenda like the essay suggests, but Americans who exist in the real world and not in the quirky stock market graphs world know that how well the stock market is doing is more and more disconnected from how well the average American is doing. The phenomenon in the article can in large part explained by rampant wealth inequality.
This description from Know Your Meme[1] is accurate as far as I’ve seen the phrase used:
“Leopards Eating People's Faces Party refers to a parody of regretful voters who vote for cruel and unjust policies (and politicians) and are then surprised when their own lives become worse as a result. It has been commonly used to parody regretful Brexit and Trump voters.”
The parody here is essentially saying that if you supported the Republicans (Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party) and then you ended up being harmed (leopards ate your face) as a result of their policies that are explicit in their intent to harm people (we will eat people’s faces) despite thinking that you wouldn’t be harmed (“I never thought the leopards would eat __my__ face”) then you are a fool.
I generally agree, but not for any critical workflow. You can't easily archive copies of web software. One day any website you rely on could introduce user-hostile regressions or simply disappear. Apps in the mobile ecosystem also have this problem, but at least you can archive and sideload old APKs on Android (for now).
Very true, but you can also keep around an old Android phone, or even emulate an old AOSP distribution if your really need to. Obviously this is not ideal, but if you're trusting your hobby or business to an app, it is in your best interest to make sure that it doesn't poof out of existence randomly before you can upgrade.
To directly address point #2, this may be music played by real musicians, but it is produced in a way that systemically forces it to be slop. Consider these quotes from the Liz Pelly investigation cited where a musician who created some of this music described how the process went:
> As he described it, making new PFC starts with studying old PFC: it’s a feedback loop of playlist fodder imitated over and over again. A typical session starts with a production company sending along links to target playlists as reference points. His task is to then chart out new songs that could stream well on these playlists. “Honestly, for most of this stuff, I just write out charts while lying on my back on the couch,” he explained. “And then once we have a critical mass, they organize a session and we play them. And it’s usually just like, one take, one take, one take, one take. You knock out like fifteen in an hour or two.” With the jazz musician’s particular group, the session typically includes a pianist, a bassist, and a drummer. An engineer from the studio will be there, and usually someone from the PFC partner company will come along, too—acting as a producer, giving light feedback, at times inching the musicians in a more playlist-friendly direction. The most common feedback: play simpler. “That’s definitely the thing: nothing that could be even remotely challenging or offensive, really,” the musician told me. “The goal, for sure, is to be as milquetoast as possible.”
One major failing of WebDAV for these use cases is that the spec requires you to `PUT` the whole resource/file in order to save changes. This isn't too bad when the individual files are small, but as your single file apps grow, this means a lot of data transfer without the comforts of differential uploads.
[0] https://developer.linuxmint.com/rel_xia_whatsnew.php