That's just too rich: a newspaper slinging charges of moderator tyranny, payola and other bad things:
But when moderators set their own rules, with no incentive to conform to anyone else’s standard, they can look a lot less like custodians and a lot more like petty tyrants.
Ha ha ha! This is little more than old media projecting on new media. Maybe the charges are true, maybe they're not. What difference does it make to me, the reader? Newspaper's content has always been subject to informal vetoes by advertisers. The "letters to the editor" have always been guarded carefully, keeping the "riff raff" and insane out.
At least Reddit has a variety of editing stances, not like the almost universal pro-big-corporations and pro-big-money stances of newspapers. At least Reddit is funny, in a non-ironic way.
Internet moderators should be about removing trolls. However, it has turned into down voting and silencing opposing viewpoints and political opinions.
The end results is even more trollish behavior because many feel they can't even state an opinion without being silenced. Reddit is a good example of this.
But when moderators set their own rules, with no incentive to conform to anyone else’s standard, they can look a lot less like custodians and a lot more like petty tyrants.
Ha ha ha! This is little more than old media projecting on new media. Maybe the charges are true, maybe they're not. What difference does it make to me, the reader? Newspaper's content has always been subject to informal vetoes by advertisers. The "letters to the editor" have always been guarded carefully, keeping the "riff raff" and insane out.
At least Reddit has a variety of editing stances, not like the almost universal pro-big-corporations and pro-big-money stances of newspapers. At least Reddit is funny, in a non-ironic way.
Newspapers are the graveyards of ideas.