>I fail to see how reframing the argument is going to change anything
I would argue that joshuak's formulation above is not a reframing, but the original and correct definition of the right to privacy. Just as with property and liberty, the default presumption should be that there is an intrinsic right of title, and that any challenge to that entitlement should face a heavy burden of justification.
>Tit for Tat. If you want to take away our privacy, then we MUST have complete transparency in return.
Such a trade off could really only be made to work in the light the formulation above.
I would argue that joshuak's formulation above is not a reframing, but the original and correct definition of the right to privacy. Just as with property and liberty, the default presumption should be that there is an intrinsic right of title, and that any challenge to that entitlement should face a heavy burden of justification.
>Tit for Tat. If you want to take away our privacy, then we MUST have complete transparency in return.
Such a trade off could really only be made to work in the light the formulation above.