Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My version of "fending off" includes an end goal where you're no longer under attack and don't have to hide out in caves.

Guerrilla campaigns work because they're driving less-committed foreign invaders out through attrition. Our domestic military has nowhere else to withdraw to, and would necessarily have broken free of public opinion (otherwise democracy would put a stop to anything long before sustained conflict).

Don't get me wrong, if any such thing occurs I would much rather have distributed gun ownership than not. Furthermore, the right to bear arms quite obviously covers conventional explosives, armored vehicles, and missiles. To the extent that this might not be good policy, then the second amendment should have been rewritten rather than simply trampled.

On the political front, it frustrates me to see the amount of energy shoehorned into "they're gonna take our guns", which imho causes people to be myopic to the other rights that are being oppressed. I'm not talking about commenters in this thread (who obviously have more than one issue in their head at once), but your less-connected punter who turns on talk radio and has their specific desire for freedom transmuted into support for a different flavor of tyranny.



> My version of "fending off" includes an end goal where you're no longer under attack and don't have to hide out in caves.

Vietnam.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: