Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I would like to complement that native youtube(the one used on mobile) is far better at playback while keeping nearly every other advantage that it has on the web.


> that native youtube(the one used on mobile) is far better at playback.

No, it is not. Playback would get stuck, sound would go away for no rhyme or reason and what not. Better experience? - no - quite the opposite.

I got rid [1] of the native nuisance completely. And the experience of search, comment and history on native was simply terrible. Much lesser control on ad-blocking too, and really the ads on YT are sometimes seriously irritating.

[1] Evidence: https://twitter.com/marvindanig/status/598701509963083777


I haven't tried YouTube on IOS but the native YouTube app for android is better than watching YouTube videos in mobile Chrome for me.

Evidence: ^


If you block the ads, how does the site make money to support your viewing habits?


That is irrelevant. I prefer to not have ads and Google is generally kind of to comply and suggest developers respect ad-blockers as well, even though the vast majority of Google's revenue comes from ads. To suggest going native to provide revenue over UX only benefits the provider, not the user.


Are you seriously arguing that Google is not making enough money?


Not at all, but it is still their main source of revenue.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: