Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Fighting terrorism isn't just about preventing X number of deaths.

The 9-11 attacks were profoundly disruptive in economic and social costs. Just in direct costs like buildings being knocked over, air travel being stopped, being not being able to get to work, was 200 billion dollars.

That's a little less than the GDP of Finland wiped out in one attack.

That is not to mention the cost of fighting the war on terrorism. All in it probably cost 5 Trillion.

You could say, hey, we didn't need to fight the war on terrorism. But the attacks were world changing events for the US. They caused fear, anger, confusion, and a need for revenge.

Whether it is rational or not, nobody is going to work in a skyscraper if every 20 months one gets knocked over. Just look at Israel and Palestine for what happens to cultures who expect terrorism (on both sides). It is caustic to a free society.

It is hard to tell how low the risk of terrorism is in a vacuum. There are certainly enough suicide bomb volunteers and other jihadists. Crossing the US border is pretty easy.

Some amount of intelligence is needed to make sure nobody is plotting something big.



Cockpit door locks. The rest we could have probably done without, especially the 'war on terrorism', which as a by-product makes more terrorists.


How much of those costs were the direct result of the planes slamming into the buildings, rather than the (over) reaction to that event?


What's the economic cost of car crashes? Or obesity? How many lives are lost in terrorist attacks vs slipping on banana peels?

What little terrorism actually exists is caused by the US government's own actions. So not only do we pay taxes to create terrorists with our sociopolitical skylarkings, we pay taxes to "fight terrorists" that are created by it. On top of this we all get spied on in the process.

I smell a raw deal.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: