I find it interesting that this was considered an innovative approach considering the popular history of how the wright brothers succeeded the very same way: by basing their plane on a bicycle and testing rapidly.
We often frame this in terms of keeping the cost of failure low...but that failure isn't really failure is it? No more than running a round of unit tests.
Keep the cost of learning low.
We often frame this in terms of keeping the cost of failure low...but that failure isn't really failure is it? No more than running a round of unit tests. Keep the cost of learning low.