Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He should have been allowed to remain CEO.

It's old hat at this point and likely not worth rehashing, but the way I ended up looking at the problem that made the most sense to me was to look at it as a chain of events, and determine if there's any event in that chain that I'd want to prevent. Obviously I don't want to prevent people from choosing which products they use; I don't want to prevent people from discussing their product choices with each other; I don't want to prevent these discussions from happening publicly; I don't want to prevent companies from acting based on public and internal opinion. Eich's departure, for better or worse, was at the end of a chain of reactions that we don't only need to accept, but defend -- an essential consequence of a system that we want to perpetuate.



I'm not opposed to people expressing their opinions. I'm simply explaining why I disagree.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: