Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> wrong side of history when it comes to LGBT human rights.

But as long as the majority of Californians agree(d) with him, does he really deserve down-votes or being called an anti-progressive dinosaur?



Yes? How is majority opinion relevant? Storm Thurmond was a hateful and bigoted anti-progressive dinosaur in the 50s. That the majority of South Carolina agreed with him does not change that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: