I wonder how they did their market research to arrive at a position where it avoids being detected breaching a limit but doesn't avoid breaching the limit when there is no camera around. It seems a fairly cynical position to adopt to appeal to a specific segment of the market. Seem very similar to a DUI insurance policy that was briefly offered in Australia (you pay premiums, caught out DUI, no problem, insurance pays).
I'd much prefer to have three options:
1 Turned off - I'll take responsibility for the vehicle myself and bear the consequences myself
2 Their proposal - I'll let the machine avoid the tickets and when nobody is looking do what I please
3 No speeding - The vehicle will never speed, I'll never get a speeding ticket under any circumstances, camera there or not, in fact Hyundai will pay the fine as it will be simply impossible to incur one and they'll put their money on the line to make sure the damn thing works.
I'd much prefer to have three options:
1 Turned off - I'll take responsibility for the vehicle myself and bear the consequences myself
2 Their proposal - I'll let the machine avoid the tickets and when nobody is looking do what I please
3 No speeding - The vehicle will never speed, I'll never get a speeding ticket under any circumstances, camera there or not, in fact Hyundai will pay the fine as it will be simply impossible to incur one and they'll put their money on the line to make sure the damn thing works.