Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Save Stack Overflow (stackoverflow.com)
2 points by paulddraper on June 8, 2014 | hide | past | favorite | 1 comment


Why not go the other way and just have the one single closure reason:

"Closed by some pompous twat, because exercising dictatorial power on an internet forum briefly helps him forget his own almost complete lack of real-world importance. Fortunately, however, you may scroll past this arsehole's non-contribution and find some useful info, left by other, less contemptible individuals"

From what I've seen of SO, that would fit nicely with about 99% of the site's topic threads.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: