In this case, the goto is into the loop, not out of it, so named break/continue would not help.

And the only point of having named break/continue would be to not use goto. I don't see the point in that, since to me, this:

    for (i = 0; i < ie; i++) {
        continue_i:
        for (j = 0; j < je; j++) {
            if (cond1)
                goto break_i;
            if (cond2)
                goto continue_i;
            /* ... */
        }
    }
    break_i:

is as readable as this:

    loop_i:
    for (i = 0; i < ie; i++) {
        for (j = 0; j < je; j++) {
            if (cond1)
                break loop_i;
            if (cond2)
                continue loop_i;
            /* ... */
        }
    }