Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There's nothing fallacious about using heuristics to judge credibility.

As for the sources given in the article, not a single one is credible.



Care to elaborate, or are you just throwing mud?


Pointing out that sources aren't credible is throwing mud now?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: