Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Weight added to the aircraft (660lb). Another factor is reliability. Wheel or tire damage can bring down an airliner. The Concorde crash. Also a DC-8 crash in Jeddah in 1991 was due to a fire in the wheel well.[1] Even things like entertainment systems cause risk. Swissair Flight 111 went down due to a fire that started in the entertainment system rack, behind the cockpit. [2]

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigeria_Airways_Flight_2120

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swissair_Flight_111



Maybe one day they can forget about landing gear and have airport based landing drones which fly up and attach under the plane. Less to go wrong on the plans and if airports have them, them certainly spares to cover situations. Though a long way from now still.

Would help too isolate a important system in a fuel effecient way with redundancy added in for landing. But when they put low priority entertainment systems in a position that worst case can effect critical systems does highlight the added risk of being able to watch a movie on the chair infront of you.


Wrong solution to wrong problem. The emergency gear extension works in a vast majority of cases. 99% of gear emergencies are minor, and either false warnings, or easily fixed on the ground, with minor or no damage to the jet.

Newer jets have wheel well fire "bottles" or extinguishers and sensors to detect problems so the crew can respond appropriately. Aircraft tires are filled with nitrogen for safety. The DC-8 ground crew topped up with air, and not nitrogen, and also flew with under-inflated tires. "Hot brakes" is a relatively common cause of aircraft incidents, and responded to by airport fire services, to avoid major disasters.

In the Swissair 111 crash, the entertainment system didn't have the proper isolating breaker installed, and wasn't fully shutdown once it malfunctioned. Placing the racks in a critical cockpit location near pilot oxygen supply lines, was a major flaw in the system design.

PS. Running out of fuel waiting for "ground landing gears" would be significantly more likely, as commented below.


I don't think that is a good idea. A simple half hour system fail could let tens of planes in emergency fuel. Also in turbulent weather is not very wise to have something trying to dock into your plane.


That's not practical for landing due to safety concerns. But Airbus has a related proposal for making take offs more efficient with an electric launching sled. http://www.airbus.com/innovation/future-by-airbus/smarter-sk...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: