Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You see this in all the AI generated Tik Toks. What causes AI to use such a weird construction.


I learned that exact style of writing in a marketing workshop, pre-AI. It's effective, satisfying, and a random third thing I can't be bothered to come up with right now.

As a proportion of all easily crawled text on the internet, a lot of it will be random marketing copy. That influenced the writing style of early AIs, and since then everyone has trained at least partially on transcripts from every other AI chatbot


Oh my god did we inadvertently train AIs on idiotspeak.


It seems to be called the Rule of 3. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_three_(writing)

Like Caesar's supposed "Veni Vidi Vici" saying, people seem to prefer and remember items when grouped in three.

I recall a public speaking film shown to my management science class starring John Cleese mentioning this rule of 3.


No, we actually trained it on standardised tests https://marcusolang.substack.com/p/im-kenyan-i-dont-write-li...


Thank you for sharing this. It brought together things I had suspected but not from his perspective. Also pleasant to read something that used rhetorical devices in a cohesive way instead of just as sprinkled on flavor packets.


In-advert-ently?


There was nothing inadvertent about it. A decade of cultivating and harvesting millions of examples of this kind of pseudo-writing from underpaid internet piece-workers preceded LLMs.


Given that this specific style is the result of being reinforced over and over again via RLHF, "inadvertently" isn't really the word I'd use.


> did we inadvertently train AIs on idiotspeak.

Nope! That is - training on lowest-common-denominator, low-signal high-noise "idiotspeak" was not at all inadvertent.


It's engaging and I doubt it happened by accident.


* Checks notes *

Reddit

Twitter

Facebook

4chan

Call of Duty chat logs

Every public marketing site

SlashDot

UseNet

...

Verdict: Yes idiotspeak was part of the training set, but no, it was not inadvertent. There's a smattering of Shakespeare in there, at least.


Wait until in 5 year's time all kids speak in rule of 3


Didn't you know? Evenly divisible numbers are infelicitous. That's why Atevi don't use them in polite conversation.


Not rule of one. Not of two. But three.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: