Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

War crimes as a concept was invented by the current US hegemony to punish others, not to be bound by.

I think about it this way: would I have had any problem with the allies bombing Nazi rallies, even though they were mostly civilians? My answer is absolutely not. I feel the same way when I see pro-Islamic regime or pro-Hezbollah rallies. In fact, I think the limited repercussions for these extremist civilians - and their very tangible support for the regimes - is what keeps these movements alive and powerful. Cost to civilizations - military and civilian alike - is what ends wars.

 help



We agreed on the concept of war crimes after the horrors of WWII, so that it wouldn't happen again.

If you think bombing them is ok, then bombing you (or e.g. Trump supporters - you know, the ones who tried to throw the 2020 election) is ok too.

It cuts both ways.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: