Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The ceasefire is over.

Iran launched three waves of ballistic missiles at Israel after the ceasefire was announced; the first wave happened about an hour after the ceasefire announcement, then another 5 hours after, then another 8 hours after.

Iran also launched waves of drones at UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia within the first few hours of the ceasefire, and they've continued more over the next 12 hours. Multiple major energy facilities were struck, including desalination plants and oil facilities. Saudi Arabia’s East-West oil pipeline was hit. In Kuwait, three power stations a water desalination plants were severely damaged following drone attacks.

Israel announced the ceasefire does not apply to Lebanon, and launched a massive wave of airstrikes on Lebanon about an hour ago. Iran said this is a ceasefire violation, and resumed launching drones and missiles.

This ceasefire is done, nobody wants to stop fighting, the war will be back to usual in the next few days.

 help



The ceasefire was never between Israel and Iran, Israel did not stopped bombing even after first announcement.

Nope, Israel did stop its strikes on Iran. However, they did not stop bombing Lebanon.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-backs-iran-truce-opp...


The poor people in Lebanon, seems Israel is targeting everything from funerals to medics.

I wonder why this isn't being covered in western news outlets. Every politician who is in AIPAC's pocket needs to be shown these headlines and be held accountable.

Israel won't get sainthood anytime soon, but Hezbollah is Iran-backed, based in Lebanon, and breaking ceasefires with Israel without direct provocation. Israel has killed over a thousand Hezbollah militants since March 2.

What would you do if you were Israel?

FTA:

> Over 1,500 people have been killed in Lebanon and about a million displaced since March 2, according to Lebanese authorities. The IDF says it has killed some 1,100 Hezbollah operatives, including hundreds of members of the terror group’s elite Radwan Force, in that period.


Israel kills people then calls them "operatives" after the fact. They have no credibility around these kinds of reports.

I get your point. I don't think it's effective here.

What do you have to say to Hezbollah confirming 400 combatant losses? The Lebanese health ministry also confirmed 1500, of which only 300 were women, children, and health workers.

It's a tragedy.


> What would you do if you were Israel?

Stop pretending like collective punishment produces results? It obviously doesn't, Israel's strikes on Lebanon have gotten to the point that it feels like another illegal expansion project.


You're right, they should just let indiscriminate rockets hit their civilians. If it was not for the iron some, there would be 100k dead Israelis. It's disgusting how westerners think their high and mighty approach works in the middle east.

Israel was never forced to commit war crimes in retaliation. If they truly want peace, they should submit to the ICC or prepare to fight the long war.

Blowback. Israel is responsible for being an impossible neighbor.

A better question to ask: what do you do when an ethnosupremacist state sets up shop near you and immediately begins territory expansion and meddling in your local politics while funding militant groups to destabilize your government? That's the question all of Israel's neighbors have had to answer for the last 60 years.


>impossible neighbor

The entire neighborhood sucks.

Doesn't this also apply to Hezbollah in Lebanon?

> "[Hezbollah's] struggle will end only when this entity [Israel] is obliterated" [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah#Attitudes_and_action...


The entire neighborhood was already there, and then Israel showed up as a settler-colonialist state.

I don't really sympathize with any State's desire for self preservation (especially since, like Israel, most states will happily sacrifice their citizenry to do so).

The radicalization necessary to feed recruitment to Hamas and Hezbollah is only possible because of the incredible violence Israel subjects the region to. Without Israel, Hamas would almost certainly not even exist, or at least would be some minor radical group with no political power.


Your argument isn't principled because starting in the 20th century is arbitrary. Why not go back in time to the 15-1600s when the Ottoman Empire went "colonial" on Jews?

We don't have a time machine.

In the present, Israel could go full pacifist, and Hezbollah doesn't go away.


> Your argument isn't principled because starting in the 20th century is arbitrary.

No it isn't, we were alive in the 20th century, it's recent and we are fully capable of, and responsible for, handling fallout from decisions made during it. Your argument justifies any imperialism. "Last year Israel occupied more Palestinian territory - it's the same as ancient history, demanding they give it back is like demanding Greece re-establishes the sovereignty of Athens."

> In the present, Israel could go full pacifist, and Hezbollah doesn't go away.

Pretty speculative. An Israel that gives back sovereignty and autonomy as well as stolen land back to Palestine (and now Lebanon), releases prisoners, and regime changes out the ethnosupremacist government takes basically all the wind out of the sails of groups resisting it as the evil it currently is.

Actually negotiating and following through is something current Israel can't swallow because it's deeply racist against the people with whom it's meant to be negotiating.


> we were alive in the 20th century...

"we"? Your point's either literal (false) or figurative (arbitrary).

Why would you say something so misleading? You'd be 100 years old for the pre-Israel British-colonial period or almost 80 for the instantiation of Israel. It seems you're unclear when Israel showed up as colonialists.

> Your argument justifies any imperialism.

Fallacy: Israel's actions and Hezbollah's actions can both be bad.

> Pretty speculative.

No, you made my point! LOL!

Now, observe your list of conditions needed (return land, release prisoners, regime change). Isn't it ironic that you laid out a bunch of actions that are far more aggressive than what I proposed? You're basically saying that a more extreme compromise is needed than what I proposed!

> it's deeply racist against the people with whom it's meant to be negotiating.

Let's accept this is true (which is terrible). The flaw is that you're blindly dismissing Hezbollah/Hamas as moderates and their stated goals to eradicate Israelis. You can't leave them out of the picture and to do so is arbitrary.


> (return land, release prisoners, regime change).

Is your proposal to "just stop doing war?" There's a reason it's happening - Israel has engaged in imperialism and genocide, and there are people alive today from whom Israel and its settlers have taken land. There's still a lot of Palestinians who can't return to their homes. Of the three entities, Israel is the one with the most (literal) ground it needs to give back to "even the scales."

Undoubtedly Hezbollah and Hamas have antisemitic members that are very interested in killing Jewish people, just as there's clear evidence for the same in the IDF, however of the two, only one has engaged in actualized genocide (the IDF), so the dissolution of the State that promoted this is a moral good. It doesn't require "the eradication of Israelis" as you say, and again, Hamas only exists because of Israel, whereas the elimination of Hamas obviously is doing nothing to stop Israel's genocide against the Palestinians (and it's clear interest in expanding this genocide and imperialism against anyone it can describe as "Arab").

You seem to be accusing me of being arbitrary because you're claiming Hezbollah/Hamas is equal to Israel in terms of evil behavior, when that isn't true: Israel is the far more evil entity, and the goal of Hezbollah and Hamas to resist and dissolve the Israeli state - there's a reason Hamas revised their charter to remove all the obviously anti-semitic stuff and focus instead on resistance ethno-supremacy movement that underlies every aspect of Israel's existence as a State.

Why not simply make all of Israel ruled by the PA? Can you make an argument against that that isn't Islamophobic? Because the reality is that Hamas and Hezbollah are moderates when compared to the actions of Israel over the past few decades, and in any case the PA was absolutely moderate and liberal compared to Israel.


You're not being objective or historically accurate in your take.

Don't believe me?

I encourage you to put this in an LLM and ask if you're being fair.

E.g., calling an Iran backed Shia militant group "moderate" compared to Israel is hyperbolical.


> I encourage you to put this in an LLM and ask if you're being fair.

Or, I could engage in a conversation with a human, like you. LLMs only tell you what you want to hear. This is disappointing that you suggested this to me, it leads me to believe you're doing this, which means your beliefs aren't backed by evidence, they're just things you thought of and then had an LLM validate.

> Don't believe me?

Nope. I am correct, objective, and historically accurate, and you're failing to demonstrate otherwise.

> E.g., calling an Iran backed Shia militant group "moderate" compared to Israel is hyperbolical.

You're just throwing around scare terms now. Nothing about "Iran" or "Shia" makes me think they're inherently more evil than "Israel." It smells like Islamophobia to me to suggest otherwise.

Here is a list of Israeli war crimes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes

Israel is continually committing war crimes, every day, including today. Every Israeli strike against Iran civilians constitutes an war of aggression and violates the UN charter and is a war crime. It has engaged in collective punishment of Palestinians, blockade, denial of water and destruction of wells, forced relocation, has admitted to using white phosphorous (including in residential areas and against Unifil peacekeepers), attacked schools, refugee camps, churches, mosques, and civilians seeking food, and has shot and killed children.

Now convince me that the IDF as a radical ethno-supremacist militant group led by a terrorist country is less evil than "an Iran backed Shia militant group."


I challenge you to find a third party, credible news source that calls Hezbollah "moderate" as you framed them.

Until then, you really can't defend your fundamental claims. I suspect you're intentionally avoiding uncomfortable truths about your core beliefs.

>is less evil than "an Iran backed Shia militant group.

See. Examples like this demonstrate you can't keep your thoughts consistent. Is it a scare term or as you just acknowledged, a proxy terrorist group funded by a foreign entity?


It's more complex than your comment.

Per your article, Israel stopped bombing Lebanon in a November 2024 ceasefire. However, Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon broke that prior ceasefire on March 2 in retaliation for the death of the Ayatollah.

> Israel has carried out massive airstrikes and pushed troops farther into Lebanon after Hezbollah, on March 2, launched its first rocket attack on Israel since the November 2024 ceasefire deal.


>Israel stopped bombing Lebanon in a November 2024 ceasefire

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Israel%E2%80%93Lebanon_ce...


Really?

This is from your wiki you linked.

>On 2 March 2026, the ceasefire effectively broke down amid the nascent 2026 Iran war,


I believe you have read the rest of the article.

Did you not read it before sharing?

What is your point?


It should be noted that they are not just bombing, but using airburst white phosphorus munitions over civilian areas attempting to scorch the earth and give people a lifetime of health problems.

[flagged]


I'm not a bot, my email and website contain my full name and are visible on my HN profile, and my website has pictures and videos of me.

First, collective punishment is not acceptable. Shooting through a baby to kill the criminal holding it hostage is obviously monstrous, so your argument that there's "Hezbollah around" is invalid. Civilians present? Then find another way, Israel. But Israel refuses because terms always include something along the lines of leaving occupied Palestinian territory, which Israel refuses to do for many indefensible reasons.

Second, though, is that Israel has lost all credibility. You say Hezbollah is in the area and the thousand people killed are Hezbollah? I say, Israel once released a picture of a calendar and said it was a list of terrorist cells. Israel has lied too much to be trusted anymore.

There's also horrifying reality that's becoming increasingly clear as more street interviews from Israel are released: it's becoming clear that much of this bloodshed is fed by ethnosupremacy and Islamophobia. Israel is becoming the next Nazi state.


LiveUAMap shows no such activity currently. Normally it provides information pretty quickly if something like that has happened.


Gonna need at least a single link to a source before I believe this. Googling provides Facebook links and YouTube videos from Fox News and AI generated “news” sites.

Maybe. I'll wait for confirmation from sources outside of the usual "fast news" channels like X, which are full of disinformation.

Part of this "fast news" channel also includes POTUS's incessant "Truths" which are also full of disinformation even about his own administration.

Really hard to find facts these days!


Absolutely! And the best part is, you can fill in any recent "POTUS" in your statement and it still applies!

Well sure, but I was referring more to the "fast" part of parent comment than the "truth" part. Every politician lies, but this one in particular lies too fast for anyone to keep up with fact checking.

I hate that my first thought is: but then why is the DOW still up 2.5%?

Stock markets move with storytelling, not facts.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: