Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Y'all aren't seeing the same future I am, I guess.

- Our career is reaching the end of the line

- 99.9999% of users will be using the cloud

- if we don't have strong open source models, we're going to be locked into hyperscaler APIs for life

- piddly little home GPUs don't do squat against this

Why are you building for hobby uses?

Build for freedom of the ability to make and scale businesses. To remain competitive. To have options in the future independent of hyperscalers.

We're going to be locked out of the game soon.

Everyone should be panicking about losing the ability to participate.

Play with your RTXes all you like. They might as well be raspberry pis. They're toys.

Our future depends on our ability to run and access large scale, competitive, open weights. Not stuff you run with LM Studio or ComfyUI as a hobby.



Eventually, we are going to figure out how to do more inference with less RAM. There is simply no way that current transformer-based LLMs are the right thing to do. LLMs still rely on emergent properties that no one fully understands, where the sheer quantity of weights and duration of training are the dominant factors driving performance.

There is no reason on God's green earth why a coding model should need to ingest all of Shakespeare, five dozen gluten-free cookbooks, the complete works of Stephen King, and 30 GB of bad fanfic from alt.binaries.furry. Yet for reasons nobody understands, all of that crap is somehow needed in order to achieve the best output quality and accuracy in unrelated fields. This state of ignorance can't last. Language models shouldn't need 10% of the RAM they are taking now.

Every other point you raise is very valid, but I really don't think hardware is going to be the problem that everybody assumes it will be.


I don't agree that we are being left behind with regards to AI, I believe it's simply not worth participating in. I hope it all comes crashing down.


That's not the right perspective to have.

Also, the only thing crashing down will be the economic participation of everyday people if we don't have ownership over the means of creation. Hyperscalers will be just fine.


Ai isn't means to creation. AI is a scam on the whole of humanity, big tech stole humanities output in form of books, research and media, and are now selling access to the slop generator.

I have created things long, long, long before AI existed, and intend on continuing to do so, without AI.


You're going to get run over.

These tools are faster and better than you when used by an expert.

Literally will run circles around you.

Assuming you're senior and good, someone of similar stature will get 3-5x your workload done in the same number of hours.

Humans are cooked without AI. I mean it.

Please try Claude Code and figure out your place in the world. It got good. Really fucking good.

I also shouldn't have to explain Nano Banana Pro or Seedance 2.0. Those models are godlike.

Please wake the hell up and stop being blind to this. You're about to get run over by a freight train.

Your output will be diminished to arts and crafts without it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: