Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The shutdown mechanism would have existed anyway and a "risk management review" sounds exactly like the sort of toothless policy that's supposed to make people feel better without actually putting any limits or enforcement on the industry


Not to mention 100K in consultancy fees for compliance.


Contrary take: it's easier to move "should" regulation to "must" regulation than it is to create the latter from nothing.

E.g. HIPAA security rule updates


Why would the industry need any limits or enforcement?


I can’t tell if you’re joking or not, but it’s funny either way.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: