Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If they had bragged that they had built their design and that is proven in practice, you might have a point. But they haven't. So you don't.

They started building, with the non-nuclear bits first, as one does.

Now they have regulatory approval.

One step after another.

 help



Building the actual reactor is the challenging bit.

You claimed that building the non-nuclear parts of the construction as evidence that the reactor itself will successfully be built, which is nonsense. That someone builds a launchpad tells you nothing about their ability to build and successfully launch rockets


No I didn't.

I gave the fact that it is being built as evidence counter the claim that it wouldn't be built at all.

Which should be uncontroversial.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: