Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Dodgson’s original paper from 1867 is quite readable, surprisingly so given that math notation and terminology changes over time.

Given that Jabberwocky is also quite readable, we shouldn't be too astonished.





> Given that Jabberwocky is also quite readable, we shouldn't be too astonished.

The conventions of literature have changed a lot less than math notation and terminology have since 1867.


I think in this case "readable" means "comprehensive", which maybe doesn't apply quite as much to Jabberwocky (albeit by design).



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: