How does "Distributing buildable source under Apache 2.0 would surely qualify to... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		FpUser 3 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub How does "Distributing buildable source under Apache 2.0 would surely qualify too" reconcile with "doesn't own the copyright to FFMPEG and simply doesn't have the legal authority to release it under any license other than the LGPL"

dtech 3 months ago | [–]

You can distribute your own code under Apache along with FFMpeg under LGPL in one download

8note 3 months ago | [–]

if they licenced their own code under apache 2.0 as buildable with the lgpl ffmeg code, without relicensing ffmeg as apache itself

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact