Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't see any references to "sexual fetishes" in the article.




That's impressive considering the article mentions "feminizing" things in big text the moment you load the page.

"feminizing" doesn't refer to a sexual fetish, it just means making something more feminine. Do you assume that something being feminine is automatically sexualized and fetishistic?

I knew you were going to say this.

"Feminizing" doesn't inherently refer to a sexual fetish but context matters. I invite you to examine the article more in depth, look at the chatroom conversations and then come to your own conclusion.


I'm right there with you. The people above your are being intentionally obtuse. Go to the "about" page, and follow the link to the "wonder" page. Scroll all the way down, and you have your answer.

fuck off

No. I will continue noticing patterns.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: