The core argument is technical. NVIDIA is not Enron, in a criminal way. Enron was cooking the books, while NVIDIA is a legitimate monopoly with a product that is in high demand. And the demand, the author claims, is artificial.
So many words for what is effectively one or two short paragraphs.
The core argument is technical. NVIDIA is not Enron, in a criminal way. Enron was cooking the books, while NVIDIA is a legitimate monopoly with a product that is in high demand. And the demand, the author claims, is artificial.
So many words for what is effectively one or two short paragraphs.
reply