Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Should I not share my experiences then about something that can't be scientifically proven? I am not actually looking to prove anything, but I am sharing my experience. I don't even win anything from people believing me, but I guess I have this weird urge to "set something straight" if in my experience something is the case. I have done tons of DIY stuff that I wouldn't have been able to without AI. Tons of side projects. In my corpo work I have been able to do more with less hours and mental effort spent, although in corpo work AI has given me less gains since most of the time I have been blocked by other factors and everyone else.

It is too fast evolving to be able to be legitimately scientifically understood. It is non sense to expect that.





> Should I not share my experiences then about something that can't be scientifically proven?

By all means share anecdotes, but maybe phrase them as anecdotes. "improving my own productivity massively" is an anecdote, whereas "delivering massive productivity gains" reads as a sweeping generalisation


I see it delivering that for others too though. To me it is so obvious that I don't understand how anyone can think otherwise...



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: