Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My account is a couple years old, and I’ll agree with what fekxpurrrt said — you expressed doubt without evidence, people challenged your doubt, and you’ve never really satisfied their objections. The experts do know more than you. A brief Wikipedia investigation corroborates what the experts have said. They seem trustworthy, it’s unclear why your doubt should be taken seriously.

Everyone is wrong sometimes. When you realize you’re wrong, do you update your beliefs to be correct, or do you double down?



What claims specifically have I made that you have evidence to the contrary indicating that I am wrong


EDIT: (after 1 hr) - Litvinenko dose was 4GBq - I was wrong by 3 orders of magnitude. My bad




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: