> namespaces were added to Linux in an attempt to add security to a design (UNIX) which has a fundamentally poor approach to security (shared global namespace, users, etc.)
If the "fundamentally poor approach to security" is a shared global namespace, why are namespaces not just a fix that means the fundamental approach to security is no longer poor?
If the "fundamentally poor approach to security" is a shared global namespace, why are namespaces not just a fix that means the fundamental approach to security is no longer poor?