Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Laws can be changed, can be reinterpreted, there are no absolutes. What matters is who is in power, and how powers are kept in check. There is no finality to any of that. It’s a constant process of keeping things up, or failing to keep things up.


This is actually one of my own fears for efficient organization at state level and above: - any new technology, any new opportunity either has checks and balances or gets exploited by smart optimizers with no regards for the commons or human flourishing - checks and balances are as you say a constant drain on public attention and resources: you need smart people doing the checking (finite resource), and receptive eyeballs (finite also) - it is thus an optimization problem. attack_surface - check_capacity = societal_explots I worry that the check_capacity term is constrained, but that the attack_surface keeps aexpanding with new technologies. At some point, we started playing whack a mole, frantically jumping from one check to another, and we're holding the fray stochastically. but at some point it's going to become extremely adversarial.


Well, where's the megaproject to raise the public's IQ by 50 so that basic game-theoretic checkings become child's play?


I agree. There's an old saying: those who want to become president (leader of a country) should in no way be allowed to do so.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: