Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So the big danger here is an internal short being far more likely?


That was my general sense. And that "nominal" is really easy to identify visually with a (relatively slow) scan. I'd guess that means it's a clear quality control thing you (i.e. battery pack makers who are buying the cells) can expect the better manufacturers to do, and pay a slight premium for.


I seem to recall this being a factor in the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 battery fire debacle. The article linked below has an xray image where you can see the anode/cathode overhanging and then being shorted by subsequent damage.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jan/23/samsung-b...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: