Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

VMware's VM products are on way out as enterprises are all Kubernetes with containers or serverles functions and this will natural trickle down.

I suspect the strategy is to extract maximum cash whilst they can.



I deal, with mid size (200-800) people and there is no k8s or serverless to be seen anywhere.

Personally I don't have a huge amount of experience with either, so I'm possibly a bit biased, but I see k8s as either a hyperscale solution or someone wanting to be cool and trendy.

Same goes for serverless, other than niche use cases of say running python code in a 100% Azure ecosystem when you just have absolutely zero other choice.


That's why I used the term trickle down, meaning in time.

It may not be k8s as we know it today, but many SMEs are most certainly using containers, via Docker.

Ultimately containers use less resources than a full VM and allow dependency management.

VMs is a reducing business.


I generally see docker (used) as a second tier isolation. IT hands out VMs to vendors/teams, and then the vendor/team spins up 3-4 containers in that VM to suit their needs.

I'm aware it's technically possible to have a large, wide fleet of containers...but I don't really see it going that way (at all).

My current thoughts of why is separation of knowledge - IT knows how to manage infra and virtualisation, and the vendor/teams know how their individual docker containers need to be set up/work.

I do agree full virtualisation is probably on the decline, but the current tech is definitely staying around in my size of business.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: