This is a great site you’ve built, and I believe it would be incredibly valuable in the current landscape of technical interviews.
I’m particularly curious about how the evolution of technical interviews for software engineers is influenced by the advancements in AI and LLMs. With sufficient proficiency in one or two languages, LLMs significantly simplify the process of learning a new language, especially when assisted by LLMs. For instance, if I were unfamiliar with specific string operators that I hadn’t used recently, I could easily refer to an AI for guidance.
I believe that systems engineering, past experiences, and behavioral qualities are becoming increasingly important factors, while the recall of specific language details or event-specific algorithms is becoming less relevant. It’s far more beneficial to have the ability to find, consume, and apply knowledge effectively. Is the Leetcode grinder still the best way to filter talent?
@cebert, Thank you. LLM and AI allow us to learn quickly, and Cursor can help us program quickly. I would like to see more interviews that test critical thinking and innovative thinking rather than just coding interviews.
I’m particularly curious about how the evolution of technical interviews for software engineers is influenced by the advancements in AI and LLMs. With sufficient proficiency in one or two languages, LLMs significantly simplify the process of learning a new language, especially when assisted by LLMs. For instance, if I were unfamiliar with specific string operators that I hadn’t used recently, I could easily refer to an AI for guidance.
I believe that systems engineering, past experiences, and behavioral qualities are becoming increasingly important factors, while the recall of specific language details or event-specific algorithms is becoming less relevant. It’s far more beneficial to have the ability to find, consume, and apply knowledge effectively. Is the Leetcode grinder still the best way to filter talent?