So I want to clarify that I don't think you're wrong, I just think that that's like saying + is a ternary operator because of course x +^{n} y, which is x plus y n times, and therefore equal to x + (n × y), has three symbols that are related by the terms.
When I called this out you started talking now about something a bit different, partial derivatives, which accept two integer indices and not just one. But behold, the symmetrical version of +^n is +^{m, n}, such that
x +^{m,n} y = m x + n y.
It’s not that any of this is wrong, ya dig? Just that we're counting to three to feel satisfied when there isn't much satisfaction to be gained.
When I called this out you started talking now about something a bit different, partial derivatives, which accept two integer indices and not just one. But behold, the symmetrical version of +^n is +^{m, n}, such that
It’s not that any of this is wrong, ya dig? Just that we're counting to three to feel satisfied when there isn't much satisfaction to be gained.