I’m not a fan of the control, but this is the free market at work. Nothing stops you or any other company from creating a competing phone with its own app ecosystem. It’s really not for the government to dictate to companies how their products can work. It’s up to consumers to choose the products they want to use.
It’s a free market because buying an iPhone is a choice. It happens to be an incredible product, so may not feel like a choice, but the experience was designed by one company and put into the market as an offering.
Apple has no control over your bank account and you have no control over Apple. You are both free to engage with each other or not.
Of course you could put apps on phones before app stores. Distribution etc. was harder, and most applications were much more limited (especially due to worse performance, network connection, and limited input methods), but a whole industry existed - there were even communities around "jailbreaking" and so on.
and you can still jailbreak now if you want to. But even with a jailbreak, I’m not sure there apps, as opposed to tweaks that you could put on the iPhone.
I can currently only jailbreak an iPhone due to mistakes made by Apple. It's conceivable that it won't be possible at some future point - though I'm not sure how this is relevant towards your earlier point?
> But even with a jailbreak, I’m not sure there apps, as opposed to tweaks that you could put on the iPhone.
There have been very limited workarounds on iPhones to enable sideloading, e.g. AltStore. These repositories are exactly the kind of apps you're looking for. But again, not sure how this is relevant towards your earlier point?
