Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I see, so bindings for gql constructs is what we’re after?


Yeah. But since gql is very flexible, you then also want to combine them in an adhoc way but still get the right structure/types back. Then there is also batching, reusing inputs and so on, so ultimately a library saves a lot of time and effort when things grow bigger.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: