Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Facebook doesn’t have a browser already. They don’t need patents. Your analogy works if you replace Facebook with Google.


I think it is becoming increasing clear, especially with the Yahoo patent suit, that Facebook desperately needs a patent portfolio. Additionally, what makes you so certain Facebook doesn't needs patents? Please, explain.


If they need a patent portfolio is beside the point. They don’t have a browser and are shopping for one, any patents they acquire would only be a bonus at that time.


Why does Facebook need a browser? This is a space I would honestly never consider them "innovating" in.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: