Sorry, but no. Responsibility for action is always with the side that is acting.
Israel is fully responsible for the murder of 40000+ of Palestinians and for starvation (simply due to being in full control of what can be given to Palestinians - if they don't want this responsibility, they can stop playing the occupation game) and massive property destruction of millions others. That's their state policy and result of their direct action. It's a democracy after all, as everyone is repeating ad nauseam.
Hamas and PIJ, and whoever else was in on the Oct 7 attack is responsible for killing most of those ~1200 people and not much more, I guess.
It's ridiculous to put blame on one side for what other side is doing to them in a carefully considered premeditated and well organized manner. This is not some personal heat of the moment self-defense, where the victim just reacts and tries to survive. You can't compare state action to that. Everything is premeditated and carefully planned.
If you go the route of blaming state action on the other side, we can go as far back as you like, to find some reason why something is other sides fault, lol.
An authority on the matter, the international court, concluded it is credible that genocide taking place by accepting the case. We don't have to argue on this anymore. It is not a lie, it is a credible allegation.
This is too much of a burden to ask. All reputable media announced that they accepted the case and this is a widely known and accepted fact. That they accepted the case is my only claim. It you found something interesting from the court documentation it is on you to bring it forward, not mearly to claim something is a large body of work may be favorable to your argument. You are just muddying the water. This is the tactic of those on the loosing side of an argument.
