> a reasonable person would expect that the fee you pay to upkeep your server is sufficient, since that's how it works in general
A reasonable person would expect their fees or one-off payments for a myriad of technology products and services sufficient to cover their costs, and yet so many of these are being discreetly subsidised by the selling of customer data. The customer (knowingly or not) ostensibly agreed to that when agreeing to the EULAs.
Arguably that's how it works in general. What's stopping a hosting service from using the same modus operandi to allegedly be able to offer more competitive prices to their customers?
A reasonable person would expect their fees or one-off payments for a myriad of technology products and services sufficient to cover their costs, and yet so many of these are being discreetly subsidised by the selling of customer data. The customer (knowingly or not) ostensibly agreed to that when agreeing to the EULAs.
Arguably that's how it works in general. What's stopping a hosting service from using the same modus operandi to allegedly be able to offer more competitive prices to their customers?