Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think such an argument would need quite a lot more work, the lack of Solomonoff induction doesn't mean we don't have probability theory.


No, I mean even if you had (perfect, non-approximated) Solomonoff induction, you could only generate probabilities for computable "theories" (programs that predict all your past and future input), but I suppose it's possible that the impossibility proofs actually depend in some way on Aleph 1, so you would need it for consistency.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: