2000 was a leap year so it would not fail in 2100. But it would indeed fail in 2... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		gield on March 1, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Ask HN: Did you encounter any leap year bugs today... 2000 was a leap year so it would not fail in 2100. But it would indeed fail in 2200/2300/2400 as 2100/2200/2300 are not leap years.

addandsubtract on March 1, 2024 [–]

But then it's someone else's problem.

topaz0 on March 1, 2024 | [–]

Most likely nobody's problem, really.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact