So sorry to observe Blockchain tech/ppl as a perfect example of a snake oil / snake oil sellers. I can clearly see a big future on this field, kind of a Democracy 2.0, the "short script which is going to replace all the governments".

But the myriad of dudes who don't know even the very basics of cryptography but having some excellent sales skills make me feel sad sometimes.

Democracy is hell on earth. Whether it is a system of government, or a means by which groups make decisions or peddles their wares. The majority tends to encumber, enslave, and/or murder the minority. The eventual outcome of any purely democratic state or process is tyranny. This is why the founding fathers choose a republican form of government that uses democratic processes. Recall that Socrates was sentenced to die by a majority vote. With that in mind, then yes, the faux value assigned to "tech influencers" is a form of democracy that's just as poisonous as people who seek to "save democracy."

You are right my man. I can not say I understand democracy as well as Bitcoin, all I can say that cryptography field is among the least trivial things in the Universe.

Are you a Balaji S fan?

My fanness is full of Satoshi N.

Agile coaches who never wrote a single line of code. Blockchain people. Coding bootcamps and content/course creators promising unrealistic timelines to developer jobs. Pretty much anyone talking like they just made OVER-9000-DOLLARS(!!!) in a week with ChatGPT/Midjourney/Bitcoin/affiliate marketing/whatever the latest fad is. To lesser degree consumer grade VPN companies.

"Agile coaches who never wrote a single line of code."

Hard disagree here. Of the agile coaches I've bumped into over the last decade or so the most excellent one I worked with was entirely non-techy and made a dramatic difference to the quality of the team.

I suppose McKinsey could fit the bill and much of the tech consulting world for that matter. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AiOUojVd6xQ

Underrated comment. McKinseys delivery to price ratio is very poor. We get a slick talking salesman and then smart but underprepared analysts, at least for we should be getting for that price!

A fun search I do is “McKinsey estimates” and see some bonkers numbers about hyped things that never really took off, at least nowhere to the degree they estimate.

Low code and no code tools claiming it's over for programmers

If you look in blockchain, antivirus or AI, you’ll find heaps of snake oil salesmen.

Why antivirus?

In order to have a 100% effective AntiVirus program, you'd effectively have to be able to solve the halting problem, and predict the behavior of every program before you ran it.

If, instead, the Operating System did its job, and enforced the choices of the user, we wouldn't be in this pickle.

Maybe nowadays it's not required. Back when I used Windows XP connected to the Internet, it was mandatory. Ofc it wasn't better than common sense but it saved me a lot of times.

It is still defense in depth though? Having email attachments run though AV is going to save someones ass even if said person should be cognisant of phishing attacks.

Many of those companies don’t know what they’re doing. They make the computer less secure instead of more secure.

Vendors of elaborate, configurable, "enterprise" tools for software development and monitoring.

JIRA, SonarQube, VeraCode, Coverity - all these apps that seem like a good idea in principle, but end up being misconfigured with complicated workflows, and generally get in the way of ever making changes to software and get used to tick the security box instead of actually fixing anything.

Web3 aka distributed ledger aka blockchain

People are still grifting in this space and I hear these guys on twitter talking about how they made six figures working in web3/dao/whateve buzzword

99% of Nostr

Most SEO tools or “experts” are snake oil.

Social Media Influencers - and the platforms they ~~rode~~ wrote in on.

techlead,joma tech,99pc of Indian YouTubers,people who gaurantee you a job after buying a course,scaler academy

Most of tech and Indian tech space these days seems like it

Oh yeah the Ex google ex Facebook ex Amazon tech lead

The ones we've already caught and convicted: FTX, Theranos, ...

Microsoft

Selling a gaming OS as a tool for companies.

Basically all consumer security apps?

Anyone selling anything at all...

IBM Watson

Crypto bros

Anyone who pitches a "safer" computer language, or methodology. Rust, for example.

People who sell memory that they know is unreliable, otherwise RowHammer[1] wouldn't work

Most of the "CyberSecurity" industry... the Operating System should be doing their job, but isn't.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Row_hammer

It's wildly insulting, defamatory, and detached from all reality on several levels, to classify Rust as snake oil.

Not a memory development guy, but I am a rust programmer and have managed cybersecurity teams. Rust is amazing for memory safety and good programing practice. And cyber… is a lot more than the OS.

I would be more worried about the opposite: future software and devices will use memory-safe programming languages like Rust, with C and assembly limited as much as possible, so things like the iPhone and the successors to the Nintendo Switch won't be able to be hacked or jailbroken to run software that wasn't approved by the hardware vendor, because there will be no buffer overflow exploits or dangling pointer vulnerabilities in them.

Is that supposed to be a bad thing?

It's a mixed thing. Good for reducing piracy and increasing revenue, probably. It does mean that people who want to be able to install whatever they want on their devices, or write software for themselves to use on their own devices, will have to start buying ones explicitly marketed with those features, because you won't be able to just jailbreak it anymore.

Why can’t a manufacturer just decide that they don’t want people jailbreaking their devices? It’s a black hole of a use case to support, especially when there are plenty of open Linux-based platforms for power-users to hack away on

Why are you arguing? I don't have any control over what manufacturers do. I'm glad there are open platform equivalents, like the PinePhone and Steam Deck. I just hope businesses like that keep existing, or else there'll be no way for you to control your devices without building them yourself. It empowers manufacturers and disempowers the individual user, even though the law hasn't changed. That's why I said it's mixed, not unilaterally good or bad. Maybe it'll be good in the long run by making people buy from platforms like that if they want control, promoting legitimate business.

Oh idk just wanted to get the ppl going