LFP batteries are definitely becoming more prevalent. The standard range Teslas in some regions come with them. As you said, NMC should limit the charging to 80% for daily use.
Interestingly for LFP the recommended is 100% so that actually means that a standard range LFP Model Y can get more miles at 100% than the long range can at 80% for daily driving. There’s not much in it but it still feels weird!
The reason LFPs are becoming more prevalent is because LFPs have worse range but are cheaper, and we've reached the tail-end of the cost-vs-range bell curve. Or to put it another way, buyers are much more sensitive to 100miles vs 200miles, than they are 300 miles vs 400 miles. OEMs just don't need the extra range, not if it increases the pricetag.
It also does wonders for the supply chain - the N in NMC stands for Nickel, and most Nickel comes from Russia. The C stands for Cobalt, for that matter.
And (no joke) the word Cobalt comes from the belief that Kobolds were defending Saxon silver mines with toxic minerals. We've known for a long time that Cobalt compounds are pretty toxic to miners.
>> LFP batteries are definitely becoming more prevalen. The standard range Teslas in some regions come with them. <<
LFP batteries are fine (but barely) for entry-level, low-range EVs, or stationary energy storage systems (aka, ESS).
>> As you said, NMC should limit the charging to 80% for daily use. <<
All lithium ion batteries, including LFP, suffers accelerated degradation under high SOC, high C-rates; or in LFP's case, extreme temperature.
>> Interestingly for LFP the recommended is 100% so that actually means that a standard range LFP Model Y can get more miles <<
That 100% SOC charging causes a lot of wear and tear in LFP batteries, but it is still required to recalibrate the BMS to avoid misreading of SOC/range and other associated problems such as cell imbalancing issues. According to Cleanerwatt reports Oct 22, 2022, as a result of 100% charging:
Tesla LFP Battery 10% RANGE LOSS PROBLEM? | Model 3 RWD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suw20wPrbL0
The brand new LFP batteries will degrade substantially quicker. There's not long-term retention data for LFP batteries on the market yet, but the trend tends to be substantially faster degradation. Trends show them stabilizing around that 10% degradation mark in about half the time as non-LFP batteries - around 50,000 miles instead of 100,000 miles."
There is no long-term data yet, though BYD has been making/using much smaller LFP battery packs in their EVs since 2009, but these LFP packs aren't likely to last anywhere near what many LFP faithfuls blindly believe they would last.
The main driver behind LFP's popularity is the cost, especially during the past 2-3 years of COVID-19 which wrecked havoc in the auto supply-chain and inflated prices. China under their massive state subsidy and protectionism (banning foreign battery competitors and cutting all subsidies to EVs with their batteries since 2015) was able to mass-produce them at scale as LFP's share of EV market went from 2% in 2020 to 30% in 2022. China is also very much behind LFP because their ability to export EVs is limited by the fact that other leading battery chemistries such as NCM/NCA are largely guarded by the Japanese and the Korean battery makers -- China ensured that they couldn't get ahead in their domestic market by banning their business very early on and cutting all subsidies to EV with foreign batteries or since 2015 under Made-In-China 2025.
Otherwise, LFP is really a cheap, inferior battery chemistry for EVs.
Interestingly for LFP the recommended is 100% so that actually means that a standard range LFP Model Y can get more miles at 100% than the long range can at 80% for daily driving. There’s not much in it but it still feels weird!