Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Also, the Taliban offered an unconditional surrender but Bush rejected it.

Citation seriously needed because Wikipedia says the exact opposite.



https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/23/world/middleeast/afghanis...

> It was in the waning days of November 2001 that Taliban leaders began to reach out to Hamid Karzai, who would soon become the interim president of Afghanistan: They wanted to make a deal.

> “The Taliban were completely defeated, they had no demands, except amnesty,” recalled Barnett Rubin, who worked with the United Nations’ political team in Afghanistan at the time.

> Messengers shuttled back and forth between Mr. Karzai and the headquarters of the Taliban leader, Mullah Muhammad Omar, in Kandahar. Mr. Karzai envisioned a Taliban surrender that would keep the militants from playing any significant role in the country’s future.

> But Washington, confident that the Taliban would be wiped out forever, was in no mood for a deal.

> “The United States is not inclined to negotiate surrenders,” Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld said in a news conference at the time, adding that the Americans had no interest in leaving Mullah Omar to live out his days anywhere in Afghanistan. The United States wanted him captured or dead.


Oh I see, after the invasion. I thought GP meant before it.


No no, after. We had decisively won but Bush wanted to keep us in for political points.


> Bush wanted to keep us in for political points

I assume it was also because the primary objective - catching bin Laden - had not been achieved.


https://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=80482&page=1

Taliban offered to extradite bin laden to a third neutral country where he would get a fair trial provided us provide evidence of his built.

Bush rejected it.


Wikipedia says the same thing you posted. But that's not what "unconditional surrender" means.


Cool so that offended a country, like how can a backwater of a dead nation make us reasonable conditions when we want blood of millions? Cool


I haven't seen that myself, but consider:

> People using CIA and FBI computers have edited entries in the online encyclopedia Wikipedia on topics including the Iraq war and the Guantanamo prison, according to a new tracing program.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia/cia-fb...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: