> You're making a correlation that the best leaders are at the top, but that's not the case.
I'm not. I said this:
"However, the majority of military is not in the upper echelons of the power hierarchy. And the majority of leaders in the military do not fall in this category of exceptionalism."
> However, there are terrible leaders everywhere, at all levels of command.
Yes, this is what I am saying.
> Military veterans are often the most preferred candidates, all things being equal, in recruiting pools because of their leadership and performance.
No. Military veterans are often preferred because it is easy to understand how you've been trained and how you will react. Because Operant Conditioning. Oftentimes it is not because you are the best, rather it is because you are predictable, and cheaper.
I'm not. I said this:
"However, the majority of military is not in the upper echelons of the power hierarchy. And the majority of leaders in the military do not fall in this category of exceptionalism."
> However, there are terrible leaders everywhere, at all levels of command.
Yes, this is what I am saying.
> Military veterans are often the most preferred candidates, all things being equal, in recruiting pools because of their leadership and performance.
No. Military veterans are often preferred because it is easy to understand how you've been trained and how you will react. Because Operant Conditioning. Oftentimes it is not because you are the best, rather it is because you are predictable, and cheaper.