Right, but if constructing OutputStream throws ExceptionA, you shouldn't have it... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		xen0 on July 15, 2023 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why checked exceptions failed Right, but if constructing OutputStream throws ExceptionA, you shouldn't have it in scope; it's not something you can use.

specialist on July 16, 2023 [–]

Agreed. I'll make that more clear next time. I omitted catch's parens, which makes it less clear.

I just want 'out' visible to both catch and finally.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact