> Requesting something and something actually happening are two very different things.
i.e., I don't have the respect of the people that are working for me.
I never had issues with people making sure chat remained in public channels.
> There is also a meaningful difference between an in-person group chat and a group chat that will remain visible to the whole team for months or years to come.
One can be referenced later with a simple text search.
The other could have been an email. And will probably end up with people forgetting what exactly was said.
> requires everyone involved to adjust to the idea that everything they ask can be later analyzed without the context of the moment, and this has a chilling effect on the kinds of things that people are willing to ask.
i.e., I work at a toxic company with toxic management.
Because those same people were speaking up regularly during in-person meetings and weren't being judged there.
Also, let's forget about video/audio.
> Accomplishing what the parent comment is talking about requires far more than “please use the group chat.”
Sure. It requires effort. No more so than what was required before. The difference? We blindly accepted what came before as the way things were.
>i.e., I work at a toxic company with toxic management.
>Because those same people were speaking up regularly during in-person meetings and weren't being judged there.
Since there's far less lawyers on this site than devs (naturally), I'll chime in with my .02c. Face to face is king. Don't say anything you wouldn't want your mom, dog, or the news saying when you wake up tomorrow morning. And you'd be surprised the stuff that people will put into writing, even after repeated notice. Ever work in healthcare and have to deal with HIPAA? It's insane how flippantly I've seen patient info shared, like it's not the first thing drilled into you. It doesn't matter if you are Jesus reincarnate, I'm sure you have said some things you wouldn't want to be read out in court.
i.e., I don't have the respect of the people that are working for me.
I never had issues with people making sure chat remained in public channels.
> There is also a meaningful difference between an in-person group chat and a group chat that will remain visible to the whole team for months or years to come.
One can be referenced later with a simple text search.
The other could have been an email. And will probably end up with people forgetting what exactly was said.
> requires everyone involved to adjust to the idea that everything they ask can be later analyzed without the context of the moment, and this has a chilling effect on the kinds of things that people are willing to ask.
i.e., I work at a toxic company with toxic management.
Because those same people were speaking up regularly during in-person meetings and weren't being judged there.
Also, let's forget about video/audio.
> Accomplishing what the parent comment is talking about requires far more than “please use the group chat.”
Sure. It requires effort. No more so than what was required before. The difference? We blindly accepted what came before as the way things were.