I was too unequivocal in my claim, point taken. Clearly there is some speech that makes violence more likely.
I still believe that claims of harm and violence are commonly made against speech that is not promoting harm or violence, in an attempt to censor that speech. The proportion of each I don't know, just that I firmly believe both exist.
by this line of reasoning, what would happen if a group of hardcore communists decided that merely talking about how free markets for AI research is a good thing is something that they cannot tolerate, and begin killing people. Do we now forbid this speech too, as CLEARLY it is getting people killed?
There is in fact a fuckton of evidence: https://news.yahoo.com/all-25-us-extremism-related-murders-l...