> * And crowd-sourcing is definitely not one of them.*
I agree, but crowdsourcing would be handy for fixing errors or improving clarity. If a bunch of people highlight a passage that they think is confusing, and give reasons, that gives the author (or others) an opportunity to clarify.
Yes, that is something that teachers could be doing, but why not make the books as good as they could be?
I agree, but crowdsourcing would be handy for fixing errors or improving clarity. If a bunch of people highlight a passage that they think is confusing, and give reasons, that gives the author (or others) an opportunity to clarify.
Yes, that is something that teachers could be doing, but why not make the books as good as they could be?