Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He would have very little chance of getting that support included; HN's code is "markdown" in name only, and is hand-parsed.


Why would the austerity of current support hinder his lobbying efforts for his improved version? If compatibility is a problem, you can just run comments before flag day through the old code. Or write a converter.


You are thinking about HN as if it was just a piece of software. It isn't just a piece of software; it's also:

* an important piece of YC's infrastructure, so it doesn't have a normal dev team; some of the data going through HN is "hazmat".

* a demonstration of a new programming language Graham is ostensibly working on, which implies that doing things "the right way" is more important than on a typical project.

* in part a secret (the published HN code is not the code running on HN).


Since it only supports emphasis, paragraphs and auto-recognizing links it's clearly not even remotely close to markdown, even in name.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: