Like most things, anti-democratic activity is a spectrum rather than black or white. It seems fairly obvious to me that there is a large gulf between the two parties on that spectrum.
It also doesn't help that true democracy isn't something people actualy want. So democracy has basically been redefined to mean a republic that makes decisions that benefit or are demanded by the most people.
> It also doesn't help that true democracy isn't something people actualy want.
Source?
> So democracy has basically been redefined to mean a republic that makes decisions that benefit or are demanded by the most people.
I claim that with lobby being allowed, democracy is a facade to hide plutocracy's ugly face.
"a republic that makes decisions that benefit or are demanded by the rich/companies that can afford lobbying" is what I think the word democracy currently hides.
they all love lobbying (= anti-democracy to me: the deeper pockets have more influence) there in washington